Category Archives: WTF

Everything that makes me (wanna) use this phrase… :-)

Synology refuses to admit annoying “Cloud Sync” Bug

Since about half a year I’m struggling with a very annoying bug in Synology’s “Cloud Sync” package I’m running on my expensive Synology DiskStation DS415+ NAS. It is still present as of today’s DSM 6.0.2-8451 Update 2.

I would like to backup my photos to my Amazon Drive/CloudDrive. As an Amazon Prime customer I can store an unlimited number of images, and only images — other files, like *.xmp sidecar files, will count against my general 5 GB limit.

The problem is that Synology’s Cloud Sync will upload the sidecar files, even though I explicitly only select “Images” to be backed up (and *.xmp is not part of Images, as I will show you!). Continue reading Synology refuses to admit annoying “Cloud Sync” Bug

AVG can’t get DNS Setup right

It seems that antivirus company AVG can’t get their DNS Setup right.

Today I spotted the below in syslog:

DNS format error from resolving for client Name (SOA) not subdomain of zone -- invalid response

So the AVG updater tried to contact via IPv6, as a record type of AAAA was requested, a host called To do so it had to “resolve” that hostname to an IP address in order to submit a crash dump for a recent crash of their virus scanner (very trustworthy!), and the DNS resolver failed to resolve the IP address. So why is this?

Let’s see:

# dig -t AAAA

; <<>> DiG 9.9.5-9-Debian <<>> -t AAAA
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 21322
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1

Huh? We can’t resolve this because our server failed? Let’s see what’s going on…

# dig -t SOA

; <<>> DiG 9.9.5-9-Debian <<>> -t SOA
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 42124
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 6, ADDITIONAL: 3

; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
;                       IN      SOA

;; ANSWER SECTION:                1160    IN      SOA 2015061601 86400 3600 1209600 10800

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:                172607  IN      NS                172607  IN      NS                172607  IN      NS                172607  IN      NS                172607  IN      NS                172607  IN      NS

Ok, so the above quoted Akamai nameservers should be able to help… Let’s see:

# dig -t AAAA

; <<>> DiG 9.9.5-9-Debian <<>> -t AAAA
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 63788
;; flags: qr rd ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 3, ADDITIONAL: 4
;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available

; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
;           IN      AAAA

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:    300     IN      NS    300     IN      NS    300     IN      NS

;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:        3000    IN      A        3000    IN      A       3000    IN      A

So the server was not authoritative to answer the request and pointed us to a different set of servers.

Note that the IP address from my error message ( belongs to one of the nameservers mentioned above!

Ok, let’s ask that server:

# dig -t AAAA @

; <<>> DiG 9.9.5-9-Debian <<>> -t AAAA @
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 47390
;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 1
;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available

; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
;           IN      AAAA

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:                60      IN      SOA 2015052909 10800 3600 604800 60

Why does the nameserver respond with an SOA record even though it’s supposed to be authoritative and was asked for AAAA? It’s not a delegation as — and this is exactly the error message — is not a subdomain of Duh!

In my humble opinion it is very disappointing if an IT security company cannot even get the basics right, such as DNS.

This issue reminded me of another similar issue I observed a while ago: Avira can’t get their DNS Setup right. And guess what? This was an antivirus company, too…

Avira can’t get their DNS Setup right

Since many months I’m seeing the following issue with Avira‘s DNS setup, and I’m thinking it’s extremely embarassing for a company working in IT Security not to even get the basics right… :-(

This is what I’m seeing:

named[2597]: DNS format error from resolving for client Name (SOA) not subdomain of zone -- invalid response

So what does that mean?

Let’s have a look at which nameservers Avira are using anyway:

$ dig -t ns

;; ANSWER SECTION:        3600    IN    NS        3600    IN    NS        3600    IN    NS        3600    IN    NS        3600    IN    NS

;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:    86400    IN    A    86400    IN    A    86400    IN    A

Ok, so in the error message quoted above is indeed one of the nameservers for domain

So let’s look up the IPv6 address record (AAAA) for on the given nameserver:
$ dig @ -t AAAA

;; AUTHORITY SECTION: 3600 IN SOA 2015010301 10800 3600 2419200 3600


Why are they returning a domain name that is not a subdomain of the original domain?! That’s an error.

And it’s especially embarassing as this is the update URL for Avira’s AntiVir product. Again remember we’re talking about a security firm here!

USB device draws too much power, PC will shut down

My dad in law recently asked me about a problem he had with his PC since a couple of days. When he switched on the PC he got an error message as follows:

A USB device is drawing too much power, the PC will shut down in 15 seconds.

Which it did. ;-)

I asked him: “What did you do?” He: “Nothing.” Me: “Really?! Nothing at all?!” He: “Well, just connected a USB stick to copy over some pictures.” I: “Huh, so nothing… Let’s see…”

First thing I did is disconnect all USB devices (because I thought he might have done something else he couldn’t remember or didn’t want to tell ;-)). The error still prevailed.

So I inspected the front USB ports. And when I saw that I didn’t know whether I should laugh or be angry. He complete destroyed one of the USB sockets, obviously by trying to force in the USB stick the wrong way. The plastic was broken (and removed!!!), and the contacts were smashed against the “cage” of the sockets, obviously causing a shortcut (and thus this “phantom” device drew too much power ;-))

I opened the case to see whether I could disconnect just the single front USB port from the motherboard. But the two ports were connected to the motherboard with a single 10-pin connector block. I could have tried identifying the wires that led to the damaged port, but I was not in the mood for it, so I just used a screwdriver with a small flat blade to “stretch out” the contacts out of the metal cage and make sure that they don’t cause any shortcuts anymore. I then “sealed” the port with sticky tape, so that he wouldn’t use the port anymore.

Afterwards the PC booted up again as usual.

That was a 20 min. measure and cost nothing at all. I bet a computer repair shop would at least have sold him a new motherboard, if not even a new board plus CPU and RAM (since the combo is already 4 years old or something…), plus work of course.

Hope this helps people with similar issues.

Router blockiert SMTP-Server-Port(s)

Vor einige Tagen kontaktierte mich eine Bekannte, deren Domain ich auf meinem Root-Server hoste. Sie sei gerade umgezogen und könne nun plötzlich keine Mails mehr senden, wohl aber abholen. Der Mailclient meldete “Kann den Server nicht kontaktieren”. Und nein, sie habe in ihrem Mailclient definitiv nichts umgestellt. ;-)

Da “klingelte” es gleich bei mir. Ich frug sie, ob sie auch einen neuen Router erhalten hätte, was sie bejahte. Meine Vorahnung ging also möglicherweise direkt in die richtige Richtung.

Was meine Vorahnung war? Nun, wenn plötzlich nach Verwendung eines neuen Routers das Versenden von Mails nicht mehr möglich ist, das Abholen aber sehr wohl noch, dann liegt der Verdacht nahe dass der Router diese Verbindungen blockt. Allerdings war mir zunächst nicht klar wieso der Router dies tun könnte.

Bevor ich weitere Untersuchungen durchführte stellte ich zunächst einmal sicher, dass mein Exim-SMTP-Server auch tatsächlich ordnungsgemäß funktioniert. Danach verschaffte ich mir Remote-Zugriff auf ihren PC mit Hilfe des kostenlosen und sehr empfehlenswerten TeamViewer.

Zum Test der Verbindung wollte ich “händisch” per Telnet eine Verbindung zu meinem SMTP-Server herstellen. Der Telnet-Client war noch nicht installiert, so dass ich ihn erst nachinstallieren musste. Dann führte ich in einem Command Prompt folgenden Befehl aus:

telnet <Mailserver-Hostname> 587

Es gab eine Fehlermeldung der Art “Connection timed out.”

Das war für mich der Beweis, dass meine Theorie richtig war. Ich verschaffte mir also per Webbrowser Zugang zur Administrationsoberfläche des (Telekom-) Routers und fand dort auf Anhieb einen Bereich, in dem ausgehende Mailserver eingetragen werden können. Die Mailserver der großen Mailprovider waren dort bereits eingetragen. Ich fügte also meinen Mailserver hinzu, und unmittelbar nach Anwenden der geänderten Konfiguration konnte die Verbindung zu meinem Mailserver wieder hergestellt werden.

Warum aber sperrt der Router unbekannte SMTP-Server? Als ich die Liste mit explizit konfigurierbaren Mailserver sah, war es mir auf Anhieb klar, obwohl ich sowas bisher nicht gesehen hatte. Der Router versucht Spambots daran zu hindern, von infizierten Rechnern aus Mail zu versenden.

An sich ja keine schlechte Idee, aber warum wird der Besitzer nicht deutlich (z. B. durch einen roten Einleger im Karton) darauf hingewiesen, dass diese Sicherheitsfunktion standardmäßig aktiv ist und welche Wirkung sie hat? Ist das womöglich auch ein Versuch, kleine Provider zu sabotieren?!

Wie auch immer, der “Einsatz” dauerte etwa eine Viertelstunde, danach war meine Bekannte wieder glücklich. Vielleicht hilft dieser Artikel ja dem einen oder anderen, ein vergleichbares Problem zu lösen. Über Feedback würde ich mich freuen.

Order in Google Play before Unix Epoch ;-)

Just noticed something funny: There’s a purchase in the “My Orders” list that supposedly happened before Unix Epoch:

Screenshot from Google Play showing one specific order -- with a date of   December 31, 1969
Screenshot from Google Play showing one specific order — with a date of
December 31, 1969

Maybe for some reason they don’t have the order date, and therefore set the date to “-1″ (so a second before Unix Epoch, which is 1970-01-01)… Just guessing…

Anyway, I thought it’s funny enough to share it with you…

Firefox 29 “Sync” nightmare

The — as I later found out — completely revamped “Sync” feature in Firefox 29 caused me a lot of grief yesterday, and I wasted more than 3 hours due to it. :-(

The issue started after I had to set the system time back on one of my Macs which I hadn’t used for a couple of weeks, so the Firefox data on that machine was outdated and not in-sync with the other machines synced to the same Firefox Sync account. Not sure whether setting the date back was the root cause, but anyway… I suddenly noticed that I had old passwords on another machine, too. Obviously it had received them via Firefox “Sync” from said Mac.

So, what to do?

I first cleared the data stored in my Firefox Sync account by logging on to the old account management (, to make sure that the outdated passwords do not propagate to more machines.

I then disassociated the machines that had already received the outdated passwords from Firefox Sync.

Afterwards I wanted to add the device back the same way I did when adding a new machine in the past. But it didn’t work as it used to work. No way I could display the sync code I needed to enter on the “master” machine. :-(

Continue reading Firefox 29 “Sync” nightmare

“MacX DVD Ripper Pro Halloween Edition” expires and lies to you

Halloween 2012 MacXDVD Software, Inc. gave away free copies of their “MacX DVD Ripper Pro” as a special “Halloween Edition”. This was a very generous gesture which I would like to explicitly recognize and thank them for.

When I recently wanted to reinstall that piece of software on my new MacBook Pro Retina and tried to enter the serial number I noticed that you can’t — the software said that it had expired. I was very disappointed. I didn’t remember that you had to activate the software before the end of the promotion. So I set back my system clock to November 2012, and presto, I could install the software again. :-)

After I ripped a DVD I set back the date to the current date, only to notice later when I wanted to rip another DVD that the software had expired(!). It does not explicitly say so, but it “lies” to you as follows:

MacX DVD Ripper Pro Halloween Edition lying to you

This message appears regardless of which DVD is in the drive (even very old ones that were released well before “MacX DVD Ripper Pro” itself was released), and even if no DVD at all is in the drive. So it is obvious that the above is not the truth, but a lame excuse for not telling you the truth that the software was time-limited from the very beginning.

Mind you, I’m not complaining about the fact that the software is time-limited as such. Even a software that is free only for a year or something is still a nice gift. What I’m complaining about is that MacXDVD Software, Inc. is lying to me. Why did they not originally include the notice that this is a time-limited copy of the software only?

The solution to this problem of course is to again set back your system time. This is not very convenient, but if you only occassionally rip a DVD it should not be a big problem.

OpenWRT Quality-of-Service module caveat: speed limit

As I still have “issues” with my DSL line being extremely slow during certain times (especially between 18:30 and 23:00), I wanted to use USB tethering from my OpenWRT router to my Android LTE phone to enjoy the massive speed I have in our area (up to 90 MBit/s downlink and 70 MBit/s uplink, according to the Ookla Speedtest.Net).

So I configured the router according to the OpenWRT wiki. The internet connection did not come up immediately, and I couldn’t find out why, so as a last resort I rebooted the router. After I switched on USB tethering again on my mobile phone (which seems to be required each time you reboot the router since the mobile phone then loses the USB tethering connection), I suddenly had a working Internet connection.

However, for some reason the Internet speeds I was seeing in Ookla’s web browser-based speed test (which is a Flash applet) were very disappointing, around the same speeds I’m used to with my DSL line (14 MBit/s downlink, about 0.8 MBit/s uplink). I thought it might be an issue with USB tethering not working well in my build of OpenWRT (still r39582), so I tried USB tethering with my Mac (using HoRNDIS). I got the full speed I expected. So back to OpenWRT…

Then suddenly I suspected what might be going on: Since I had more or less exactly the same speed as my DSL connection (with the uplink of less 1 MBit/s being dramatically slower than what I should get via LTE) I thought about what could possibly limit the speed. And then I remembered that in the “Quality of Service” (QoS) module I configured the speeds of my DSL line (at the top of the page, in the Download speed (kbit/s) and Upload speed (kbit/s) fields). Could it be that these settings actually limit your speed to these values?!

I disabled QoS, and immediately thereafter I got the full LTE speed I expected.

So, another thing learnt.

I hope this helps people who might be in a similar situation…

Don’t neglect your iPhone, or else… :-(

I did not use my iPhone4 for a while (since I have a Samsung Galaxy S4 now, which I like much more), and when I wanted to “revive” it recently as a music player I found that it had burst (no, I didn’t drop it, it was just lying around on my desk):


20130927T100257-IMG_0107Obviously the battery had swollen…

I immediately called the Apple dealer closest to my home and told them about it. They said it’s normal for a battery to burst if the device hasn’t been used for a while. They said I could buy a new iPhone 4 for a “mere” 190 EUR… :-(

If you Google for this issue you will notice that it’s pretty common, still Apple cares a sh*t about it… I’ve never seen such major battery issues on any mobile phone I’ve owned before — and I had many!!!

Thanks, Apple. This is what you get when you buy from a “premium” manufacturer…

Needless to say that I will never buy an iPhone again…